1/6/2024 0 Comments Picktorial 3.5 review![]() Received: JanuAccepted: NovemPublished: December 18, 2018Ĭopyright: © 2018 Mostafa et al. PLoS ONE 13(12):Įditor: Erin Sutfin, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, UNITED STATES (2018) Do pictorial health warnings on waterpipe tobacco packs matter? Recall effectiveness among Egyptian waterpipe smokers & non-smokers. Participants reported that PHWs on WTPs motivated 58.5% of waterpipe smokers to think about quitting 64.5% to reduce their consumption 42.2% to forgo a smoke 24.5% to attempt to quit 57.1% of former waterpipe smokers to successfully quit and 59.3% of non-smokers to remain smoke-free.Ĭitation: Mostafa A, Mohammed HT, Hussein RS, Hussein WM, Elhabiby M, Safwat W, et al. At least half of participants cognitively processed the warnings: 56.3% thought of the warnings when WTPs were out of sight non-smokers understood the warnings (83.2%) and discussed them with others (90.3%) significantly more than current (76.0% and 72.5%, respectively) and former waterpipe smokers (81.0% and 61.9%, respectively). More than three-quarters of participants reported that WTS health risks were communicated through the warnings. ![]() Salience was significantly less among females, urban residents and participants with high literacy. Approximately two-thirds of participants noticed PHWs on WTPs. Participants’ mean age was 35 years, mostly males (90.4%), waterpipe smokers (74.0%) and rural residents (59.3%).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |